{"id":2015,"date":"2025-09-22T05:38:29","date_gmt":"2025-09-22T05:38:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tcap.blog\/?p=2015"},"modified":"2025-09-22T06:04:05","modified_gmt":"2025-09-22T06:04:05","slug":"cummins-confidential-executives-too-important-to-respond-to-human-rights-concerns","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tcap.blog\/2025\/09\/22\/cummins-confidential-executives-too-important-to-respond-to-human-rights-concerns\/","title":{"rendered":"Cummins Confidential : Executives Too Important to Respond to Human Rights Concerns"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Alright – here\u2019s your moment of clarity. We asked. They ignored. No weasel-worded press release, no bland corporate statement, no \u201cwe take this seriously\u201d copy-paste. Just silence from the people at the very top who ought to be answering for alleged links between Cummins\u2019 Accelera arm and suppliers with links to alleged forced labour.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Below are the exact emails TCAP sent to Cummins senior figures – verbatim – with the dates and deadlines we gave. They were given an opportunity to respond before publication. They chose not to. Read them. Judge for yourself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Why This Issue Matters<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Cummins bangs on about ESG, ethics and transparency in glossy investor decks. Yet when direct, specific allegations linking a supplier to forced labour and potential national-security risks in supply chain tech are presented, the company\u2019s senior leaders go quiet. That silence is an answer in itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We\u2019ve reported the supplier material – EVE Energy – and flagged the salient risks. Investors, regulators and the public deserve to know whether the people in charge will respond. They won\u2019t. So we publish the outreach, in full.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Emails sent by TCAP (verbatim)<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

On 04\/09\/2025 17:40, The Cummins Accountability Project wrote:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Dear Ms. Rumsey,<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I am writing to request comment regarding recent concerns raised about Cummins\u2019 Accelera division and its supply chain links to forced labour, particularly in relation to EVE Energy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As you will be aware, this issue is attracting growing attention from shareholders, the press, and the wider public. Investors including BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street, T. Rowe Price, and Fisher Asset Management have been directly engaged on this matter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Given Cummins\u2019 stated commitments to ESG principles, transparency, and human rights, I would be grateful if you could provide Cummins\u2019 position on:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  1. Whether Cummins has conducted due diligence into these alleged forced labour connections.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  2. What steps, if any, Cummins is taking to review or alter its supplier relationships.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  3. How Cummins plans to reassure shareholders, employees, and the public that its operations align with stated ethical and sustainability standards.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    Your response will be included in forthcoming reporting unless you indicate otherwise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Thank you for your time, and I look forward to your reply given the gravity of this issue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Sincerely,
    Lee Thompson
    The Cummins Accountability Project
    https:\/\/tcap.blog<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

    \n\n\n\n

    On 05\/09\/2025 11:42, The Cummins Accountability Project wrote:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n

    Dear Ms. Rumsey,<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    I am following up on my request of 4 September (unanswered) regarding Cummins\u2019 supply chain and forced labour concerns linked to EVE Energy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Since then, further allegations and developments have come to light which I would like Cummins to address:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      \n
    1. Forced labour in Tibet \u2013 A 2024 Globalworks Lund AB report highlights salient risks of state-imposed labour and forced relocations in Tibetan regions linked to EVE Energy\u2019s operations. What due diligence has Cummins conducted regarding these allegations?<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    2. U.S. national security bans \u2013 The Decoupling from Foreign Adversarial Battery Dependence Act, introduced by Senator Rick Scott in February 2025, alongside existing DoD procurement bans, place EVE Energy among Chinese battery firms flagged as potential security risks. Reuters also reported in May 2025 on \u201crogue\u201d communication devices embedded in Chinese inverters and batteries. How does Cummins reconcile its Department of Defense contracts with this partnership, and what safeguards are in place?<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    3. ESG consistency \u2013 Cummins has repeatedly cited its ESG commitments. Given investor sensitivities, has Cummins considered the reputational and legal risks of maintaining this joint venture in light of the above?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

      I would be grateful if Cummins could provide a statement or response to these specific points. Please note that, absent a reply, my forthcoming reporting will reflect that Cummins has declined to comment on forced labour in Tibet and U.S. national security concerns regarding its partner, EVE Energy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      I request your response by 17:00 BST, Monday 8 September 2025.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Sincerely,
      Lee Thompson
      The Cummins Accountability Project
      https:\/\/tcap.blog<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

      \n\n\n\n

      On 05\/09\/2025 18:14, The Cummins Accountability Project wrote:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

      \n

      Dear Ms. Koski,<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      I am following up on my previous inquiries regarding Cummins’ supply chain and its links to forced labour, particularly concerning EVE Energy. For context, my reporting on this matter is available here:<\/p>\n\n\n\n